Steer · Captive demand
Treasury-bill floors and coverage coefficients for banks
- What it is
- An order that each bank keep a minimum portfolio of Treasury bills or short-term government paper, often fixed relative to a base date plus a share of any later deposit growth (France's 'planchers'), or a 'coverage coefficient' tying part of bank liabilities to state paper (Belgium).
- Why it counts
- Bank deposit growth is automatically recycled into short-term Treasury paper at administered rates, consolidating floating debt and guaranteeing take-up of new bills.
When it was in force
- France: 1948, historical; its end is not documented
- France: 1948 → 1967, historical
- Belgium: 1956, historical; the rule may be older than the cited document; its end is not documented
3 examples
France
1948HistoricalIts end is not documented · As cited: 1948-
From 1 October 1948 each bank had to keep Treasury paper equal to 95% of its 30 September 1948 holdings, increased by 20% of any later growth in its liabilities.
France today: index 54.6Banque de France / Conseil national du crédit: instruction annexed to the Governor's letter of 30 September 1948 (minimum portfolio of 'valeurs du Trésor', the 'planchers')Secondary source
“Pour chaque banque, ce portefeuille minimum doit être égal à 95 % de son portefeuille en valeurs du Trésor, arrêté à la date du 30 septembre 1948”
France
1948 → 1967HistoricalAs cited: 1948-1960s
Sociologist Benjamin Lemoine describes the floors as forced bank subscription of Treasury bills, from 1948, that had to rise in proportion to deposit growth; the system was relaxed and then abolished in the early Fifth Republic as the circuit was dismantled from the 1960s.
France today: index 54.6Système des 'planchers' de bons du Trésor (post-war circuit du Trésor)Secondary source
“Le système dit des « planchers » contraint en effet les banques, à partir de 1948, à détenir dans leurs portefeuilles une proportion conséquente de bons”
Belgium
1956HistoricalThe rule may be older than the cited document · Its end is not documented · As cited: 1956 (in force)
Belgian banks were subject to legal coverage coefficients obliging them to hold state paper; the Finance Minister told the committee this did not harm private investment because in practice banks held state funds well beyond their legal obligations.
Belgium today: index 44.0Coefficients de couverture imposed on Belgian banks, as discussed in the Chamber Finance Committee report on the 1956 Finance Ministry budget (28 February 1956)Primary source
“Au sujet des coefficients de couverture imposés aux Banques, le Ministre fait remarquer que le concours apporté par celles-ci au financement de la trésorerie de l'Etat”
Examples and their dates reviewed .
More captive demand
Further reading
- The Coming Great Repression? New Measures and a Century of Evidence
- The Sovereign-Bank Nexus in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies: Trends, Determinants, and Macrofinancial Implications
- Financial engineering is no substitute for interest rates: Lessons from Türkiye
- ‘Muddling through or tunnelling through?’ UK monetary and fiscal exceptionalism and the Great Inflation
12 more on captive demand
- The Aftermath of Debt Surges
- The regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures - discussion paper
- Indian Financial Sector: Structure, Trends and Turns
- Financial Regulation and Government Revenue: The Effects of a Policy Change in Ethiopia
- Financial Repression: Evidence and Theory
- The Political Origin of Home Bias: the case of Europe
- The Liquidation of Government Debt
- Tracking Global Demand for Emerging Market Sovereign Debt
- Tracking Global Demand for Advanced Economy Sovereign Debt
- Financial repression: Then and now
- A New Database of Financial Reforms
- Financial Repression and Exchange Rate Management in Developing Countries: Theory and Empirical Evidence for India