Hold · Rate caps
Officially supported deposit-rate agreements
- What it is
- Authorities support banking-association agreements or self-regulatory ceilings that restrain deposit competition even after formal interest-rate liberalisation.
- Why it counts
- Coordinated pricing prevents banks from bidding up returns to savers and preserves low funding costs.
When it was in force
- China: 2015 → now, in force
- Hong Kong: 1981 → 2001, historical; the rule may be older than the cited document
2 examples
China
2015 → nowIn forceAs cited: October 2015-present (documented to 2022)
Member banks continued to price within a self-regulatory deposit ceiling after statutory administrative controls were removed.
China today: index 59.5Interest Rate Self-regulatory Mechanism; PBC-guided ceiling reform of June 2021Primary source
“autonomously set deposit rates within the self-regulatory ceiling of deposit interest rates.”
Hong Kong
1981 → 2001HistoricalThe rule may be older than the cited document · As cited: before July 2001
Banks were required as association members to comply with maximum rates on covered Hong Kong dollar deposits.
Hong Kong Association of Banks Rules on Interest Rates and Deposit ChargesSecondary source
“All banks in Hong Kong, as members of HKAB, were required to observe these rules”
Examples and their dates reviewed .
More rate caps
Further reading
- Financial engineering is no substitute for interest rates: Lessons from Türkiye
- What about Japan?
- ‘Muddling through or tunnelling through?’ UK monetary and fiscal exceptionalism and the Great Inflation
- Reassessing the fall in US public debt after World War II
8 more on rate caps
- Interest Rate Repression: A New Database
- Interest-Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocations
- Financial Repression is Knocking at the Door, Again
- Indian Financial Sector: Structure, Trends and Turns
- The Liquidation of Government Debt
- Financial repression: Then and now
- Interest Rate Liberalization in China
- A New Database of Financial Reforms